Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Makes Closing Arguments in Amber Heard Trial

Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Makes Closing Arguments in Amber Heard Trial

Johnny Depp’s attorneys Benjamin Chew and Camille Vasquez delivered blunt closing arguments on Friday because the Depp v. Heard trial got here to a detailed. The plaintiff’s staff mentioned that Amber Heard and her authorized staff wanted to “show that her abuse claims aren’t a hoax,” and requested the jury to contemplate whether or not they had been profitable. They mentioned that this was particularly necessary in consideration of Heard’s $100 million counterclaim on this case.

“What you could have ultimately is Miss Heard’s phrase – do you belief it?” Vasquez requested the jurors. She centered closely on Heard’s counterclaim ultimately, in accordance with a report by Deadline, implying that it put the onus on Heard to show the reality of her claims fairly than on Depp’s staff to show their falsehood. She mentioned that any broken to Heard’s fame for the reason that divorce was not Depp’s fault, nor was it associated to lawyer Adam Waldman’s interview with The Each day Mail which spurred the counterclaim. Vasquez mentioned that there’s “clear proof that Waldman believed that Heard dedicated a hoax.”

Vazquez additionally questioned whether or not Heard’s profession and fame have been meaningfully broken, stating that she was capable of maintain her roles in Justice League, Aquaman and Aquaman 2. She reminded jurors of Warner Bros. Walter Hamada’s testimony, the place he mentioned that Heard’s paycheck for Aquaman and the Misplaced Kingdom was not diminished even after her screentime within the script was.

Vasquez acknowledged a few of Depp’s flaws and missteps — which Chew would concentrate on extra later — however she insisted that the jury decide a facet on this case. Whereas Heard’s lawyer mentioned that the jury solely wanted to consider one occasion of home abuse to absolve Heard of defamation, Vasquez disagreed. She mentioned: “Both [Heard] is telling the reality, together with in her most excessive allegations, or she is mendacity.”

See also:  Prince Louis Wears Dad Prince William's Mini Sailor Swimsuit for Jubilee Celebration 37 Years Later

Chew started his closing arguments by saing that “Earlier than Amber Heard, no girls ever… claimed Mr. Depp raised a hand to her in his 58 years,” despite Ellen Barkin’s testimony about an incident the place Depp threw a wine bottle at her an a bunch of get together visitors in his condo. Chew used a number of buzzwords, calling this trial “MeToo with none MeToo” and saying that “Depp was canceled as a result of Miss Heard falsley accused him of home violence.”

Chew acknowledged that Depp “isn’t any saint,” referring to his drug use, his violent language and his earlier entanglements with the legislation. Nonetheless, he mentioned “there’s a world of distinction between having substance abuse issues and being a bodily abuser.” Like Vasquez, Chew additionally emphasised that Heard’s op-ed accused Depp of bodily and sexual abuse particularly, so the jury’s perception in verbal abuse wouldn’t do.

The jury is deliberating on the Depp v. Heard case now to find out whether or not Heard is responsible of defamation, and in addition whether or not Depp defamed Heard by the method of this public spectacle. There isn’t any telling after they would possibly submit a call.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.